Language Selection

Get healthy now with MedBeds!
Click here to book your session

Protect your whole family with Orgo-Life® Quantum MedBed Energy Technology® devices.

Advertising by Adpathway

         

 Advertising by Adpathway

Why I Stopped Accepting Workarounds in Perioperative Care

1 month ago 30

PROTECT YOUR DNA WITH QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY

Orgo-Life the new way to the future

  Advertising by Adpathway

Last week, a patient arrived at our endoscopy suite for a procedure on her pancreas. She'd been on our schedule for two weeks. Her chart clearly documented significant ascites (fluid buildup in her abdomen) that we'd known about for over a month. But nobody had coordinated drainage before her procedure day.


We scrambled. Made calls. Delayed the case. Kept her NPO [nothing by mouth] longer than necessary while her family sat in the waiting room, confused about why a documented problem suddenly became an emergency.


This shouldn't be remarkable. At most hospitals, it's just Tuesday.


For years, I accepted this as the cost of doing business in perioperative care. We had workarounds for everything: missing documentation, last-minute clearances, patients who
arrived with uncontrolled comorbidities that had been sitting in their chart for weeks. We got pretty good at the workarounds. We took pride in our ability to adapt, to make it work despite the chaos.
 Then the glass broke for me. Workarounds aren't healthcare. They're evidence of broken systems that we've normalized because we've run out of bandwidth to fix them.

The micro-decisions we don't talk about

Here's what nobody tells you about being an anesthesiologist: Most of your day isn't medicine. It's navigating around obstacles that shouldn't exist.


Every patient interaction involves dozens of micro-decisions that have nothing to do with clinical care. Finding the right form in the EHR. Tracking down a specialist's note that should have been filed weeks ago. Calling the same patient three times because they missed the portal message about stopping their GLP-1 medication. Documenting the same information in multiple places because systems don't talk to each other.


These aren't small inefficiencies. They're deaths by a thousand cuts. And in perioperative care, they don't just waste time, they create real risk. When your Pre-Admission Testing (PAT) nurse is spending 40% of their day chasing documentation, she's not doing what she's actually trained to do: clinical assessment and patient education. When patients slip through the cracks, they show up unprepared, and we either cancel (devastating for surgical oncology patients) or proceed with elevated risk.


The really insidious part? We've built entire roles around these workarounds. We hire coordinators to coordinate coordinators. We create committees to discuss why our processes don't work. We implement new EHR modules that promise to fix things but actually just add more clicks.

The hidden cost of "good enough”

Here's what keeps me up at night: We've become so accustomed to dysfunction that "good enough" has become our standard. The EHR has a module for preoperative assessment? Good enough. We have a patient portal they can use? Good enough. Our cancellation rate is only 8%? Good enough.


But "good enough" isn't good enough when you look at what it actually means for patients. For surgical oncology patients, it means delayed cancer treatment, unnecessary anxiety, and worse outcomes because we didn't optimize them when we had the chance. For neurosurgery patients, it means postponing time-sensitive procedures where every day matters. For orthopedic patients, it means extended periods of pain and immobility while waiting for a rescheduled joint replacement. For pediatric patients, it means multiple rounds of fasting and family disruption, creating trauma around an already stressful experience.

And for clinical staff, "good enough" means burnout. It means operating below your license. It means spending your career compensating for systems that should work better.


The financial impact is enormous too. Every cancelled surgery costs hospitals $1,500 to $5,000 in lost revenue. Preventable complications from inadequate preoperative optimization cost even more. Poor documentation leads to denials and reduced reimbursement. Add it up across a year, across a health system, and you're talking about millions of dollars lost to inefficiency.

Three steps to stop accepting workarounds

Recognizing the problem is just the first step. Here's what perioperative leaders can do this week to start breaking the workaround cycle:

• Start measuring what matters. You can't fix what you don't measure. Begin tracking specific, actionable metrics: How much time does your PAT nurse spend chasing outside records per patient? What percentage of day-of-surgery cancellations are due to issues that were documented in the chart more than 48 hours before the procedure? How many patients arrive for surgery with unoptimized comorbidities that were known at the time of scheduling? These aren't abstract efficiency metrics, they're patient safety and revenue protection indicators.

• Map your actual workflows, not your intended workflows. Spend a day shadowing your PAT nurses, your schedulers, and your pre-op staff. Document every workaround, every redundant step, every system they have to log into, every phone call they make to track down information that should be automatically available. You'll be shocked by the gap between how you think the process works and how it actually works. This gap is where your opportunities live.

• Give clinicians a voice in operational decisions. The people doing the work know where the problems are. Create a structured way for frontline staff to identify pain points and propose solutions. This doesn't mean creating another committee, it means empowering an anesthesiologist or experienced PAT nurse to lead operational improvement with actual authority and resources. When clinicians drive the change, adoption follows.

The path forward exists, but it requires more than recognizing the problem. It requires leaders who are willing to challenge "good enough" and clinicians who refuse to accept that workarounds are just part of the job. For surgical oncology patients and every other patient facing surgery, we can't afford to keep accepting broken systems. The time to start measuring, mapping, and fixing them is now.

Andrew Fisher, M.D., is Co-Medical Director for Perioperative Care Coordination at Qventus and Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology at the Medical University of South Carolina, where he practices clinical anesthesiology.

Read Entire Article

         

        

Start the new Vibrations with a Medbed Franchise today!  

Protect your whole family with Quantum Orgo-Life® devices

  Advertising by Adpathway